In multisite clinical research, speed is often regarded as the primary measure of success. Yet the “fastest to fill” approach to competitive enrollment, rewarding sites for volume and velocity, can undermine the very outcomes clinical trials are designed to achieve: reliable data, sustainable budgets, and participant retention.
The Pitfall: High Costs of Rapid Enrollment
In traditional competitive enrollment studies, sites rush to enroll patients who may not be ideal candidates for long-term participation. This creates:
- High screen-failure rates that erode efficiency and inflate costs.
- Increased dropout rates that disrupt timelines and data availability.
- Strained site operations balancing heavy administrative loads and resource constraints.
- Rushed patient experiences that weaken engagement and increase attrition risk.
Combined, these factors extend budgets and timelines, consume additional resources, and jeopardize the very outcomes trials seek to achieve.
The Impact: Retention as a Critical Determinant of Trial Success
Retention is not simply a metric; it is foundational to the integrity and credibility of clinical research. High screen-failure rates and participant attrition diminish confidence in outcomes, erode operational efficiency, and strain relationships between sponsors, sites, and participants. Addressing these issues requires a model that prioritizes both accuracy and long-term engagement.
The Solution: ProSciento’s Precision Enrollment
ProSciento’s Precision Enrollment flips the script. Instead of incentivizing volume and speed as the only benchmarks, it rewards accuracy, engagement, and retention to help sponsors and sites achieve more predictable, sustainable outcomes.


